17 novembro 2003

Etsá grio..


Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae.

The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.

E a rpesveitca tçarudão:

De aorcdo com uma pqsieusa de uma uinrvesriddae ignlsea, não ipomtra a odrem plea qaul as lrteas de uma plravaa etãso, a úncia csioa iprotmatne é que a piremria e útmlia lrteas etejasm no lgaur crteo.

O rseto pdoe ser uma ttaol csãofnuo que vcoê pdoe anida ler sem gnderas pobrlmeas. Itso é poqrue nós não lmeos cdaa lrtea isladoa, mas a plravaa cmoo um tdoo.

Cosiruo, não?

Literatura Científica


Finalmente encontrei o conjunto de regras essencial para a compreensão rápida e inequivoca dos artigos de investigação clínica (e não só).

Como os autores nem sempre conseguem escrever o que realmente querem dizer, aquí vão as respectivas traduções.


# "IT HAS LONG BEEN KNOWN"... I didn't look up the original reference.

# "A DEFINITE TREND IS EVIDENT"... These data are practically meaningless.

# "WHILE IT HAS NOT BEEN POSSIBLE TO PROVIDE DEFINITE ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS"... An unsuccessful experiment, but I still hope to get it published.

# "THREE OF THE SAMPLES WERE CHOSEN FOR DETAILED STUDY"... The other results didn't make any sense.

# "TYPICAL RESULTS ARE SHOWN"... This is the prettiest graph.

# "THESE RESULTS WILL BE IN A SUBSEQUENT REPORT"... I might get around to this sometime, if pushed/funded.

# "IN MY EXPERIENCE"... Once

# "IN CASE AFTER CASE"... Twice

# "IN A SERIES OF CASES"... Thrice

# "IT IS BELIEVED THAT"... I think.

# "IT IS GENERALLY BELIEVED THAT"... A couple of others think so, too.

# "CORRECT WITHIN AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE"... Wrong.

# "ACCORD1NG TO STATISTICAL ANALYSIS"... Rumour has it.

# "A STATISTICALLY-ORIENTATED PROJECTION OF THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THESE FINDINGS"... A wild guess.

# "A CAREFUL ANALYSIS OF OBTAINABLE DATA"... Three pages of notes were obliterated when I knocked over a glass of beer.

# "IT IS CLEAR THAT MUCH ADDITIONAL WORK WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE A COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING OF THIS PHENOMENON OCCURS"... I don't understand it

# "AFTER ADDITIONAL STUDY BY MY COLLEAGUES"... They don't understand it either.

# "THANKS ARE DUE TO JOE BLOTZ FOR ASSISTANCE WITH THE EXPERIMENT AND TO CINDY ADAMS FOR VALUABLE DISCUSSIONS"... Mr. Blotz did the work and Ms. Adams explained to me what it meant.

# "A HIGHLY SIGNIFICANT AREA FOR EXPLORATORY STUDY"... A totally useless topic selected by my committee.

# "IT IS HOPED THAT THIS STUDY WILL STIMULATE FURTHER INVESTIGATION IN THIS FIELD" I quit.

O texto integral pode ser encontrado em http://www.herts.ac.uk/astro_ub/a_quips.html